Image source: www.flickr.com/photos/asterix611/9480969863/sizes/m/in/photostream/
File sharing and peer to peer (P2P) technologies allow artists to have greater control over the production, distribution and earning power of their creative output. This is highly disruptive to the music industry business model.
When
controversial performing artist Amanda Palmer’s label wanted to delete video scenes
showing her stomach, outraged fans mobilised with The reBellyon. Palmer’s
counteraction to this devaluation/validation struggle was to leave her label
and seek support through crowd funder, Kickstarter.
Image source: http://jezebel.com/5101424/rebellyon
Author Cory
Doctorow is another high profile file sharer. He argues that distributing his books in this
way means more people get to read his work; further, it’s ‘good for business’
as it brings him other opportunities (Doctorow 2008).
Palmer is
motivated by trust of her fans and has been asked how she makes people give her
money (for seeing her perform).
“I [don’t] make
them, I let them,” she says (Palmer 2013).
Melbourne jazz
pianist Nat Bartsch also recently crowd funded, via Pozible, her latest album, To Sail To Sing, facilitating and speeding
up alternatives to music industry processes.
Nat acknowledges the benefits of independence for artists from a
business whose products (CDs) are becoming less and less in demand (Bartsch, N 2012, email interview).
Image source: Samara Clifford, http://natbartsch.com/about-us/
Palmer provides
an example of what Martin, Moore and Salter (2010) describe as ‘competing
injustices’. Palmer’s request for
musicians to join her on stage (only hugs and beer as payment) was met
with scorn from musician industry groups, who countered that musicians should
be properly compensated (Wakin (a), 2012).
Palmer subsequently reversed her decision and paid the musicians Wakin
(b), 2012).
Radiohead’s Thom Yorke also
exemplifies the dichotomy in the changing landscape of the music business. I remember the buzz around my household in 2007 when In Rainbows was made available as a
download, with the suggestion that you pay whatever you want. My sons downloaded it without paying, while my
husband paid £10. However, Yorke is now castigating
music streaming service, #Spotify, claiming that “… new artists … on #Spotify will (not) get paid. Meanwhile
shareholders will shortly being rolling in it” (Spangler, 2013).
Stevens (2003, p53) points
out that the dominance of the media oligopolies is not absolute as new
technologies of production and distribution change the way creative industries
operate.
Martin, Moore and
Salter (2010) also raise the question of alternatives to the industry model and
both Palmer and social innovator Rachel Botsman (2012) discuss the ‘currency of trust’ and how collaborative consumption empowers people to ‘make meaningful
connections and engage in a marketplace built on personal connections’ (Botsman
2012).
References:
Bartsch, Nat 2012, email interview conducted with blog author.
Botsman, R
2012, ‘Rachel Botsman: The currency of the new economy’, TEDGlobal, Edinburgh, June 2012
http://www.ted.com/talks/rachel_botsman_the_currency_of_the_new_economy_is_trust.html
retrieved 5 August 2013
Doctorow, C 2008 Content, Tachyon Publications,
San Francisco, USA
http://craphound.com/content/Cory_Doctorow_-_Content.pdf
retrieved 5 August 2013
Martin B,
Moore C, and Salter C 2010, ‘Sharing music files: tactics of a challenge to the
industry’, First Monday, Vol 15 No
12, 6 December 2010
http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2986/2680
retrieved 5 August 2013
Palmer, A
2013, ‘Amanda Palmer: The art of asking’, TEDConference,
Long Beach, Ca, USA, February 2013
http://www.ted.com/talks/amanda_palmer_the_art_of_asking.html
retrieved 5 August 2013
Spangler,
T 2013, “British artists yanks solo album and Atoms for peace project citing
music service’s payment terms’, Variety.Com,
15 July 2013.
http://variety.com/2013/digital/news/radioheads-thom-yorke-pulls-music-from-spotify-in-protest-1200562760/
retrieved 11 August 2013
Steven, P 2003, ‘Political economy: the howling,
brawling, global market place’, The no-nonsense guide to global media,
2003, New Internationalist/Verso, Oxford, pp. 37-59
Wakin,
Daniel J 2012, ‘Rockers Playing for Beer: Fair Play?’, The New York Times, 12 September 2012: C1(L). Expanded
Academic ASAP. Retrieved 12 Aug.
2013
Wakin, Daniel J 2012, ‘Musician
Changes Tune And Will Pay Volunteers,’ The New York Times, 19 September 2012: C2(L).
Expanded Academic ASAP. Retrieved 12 Aug. 2013
Mary-Anne, another great read on your blog. I too agree that there are as many pros as there are cons in regards to file-sharing in the music industry.I found this topic to be an interesting debate due to the fact that whilst file-sharing is largely impacting artists in our current day, the music industry is forever expanding and changing in ways we never imagined even 5 years ago. I think your reference from Stevens summed this up perfectly. The way in which media oligopolies are no longer supreme due to the fact that technology is forever changing, results in the need for creative industries to continue to grow, revise and develop innovative ways in which they trade.
ReplyDelete